Make vs n8n (2026): Which AI Tool Is Better?
Both are popular workflow builders & open studios. Here is how Make and n8n stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.
Make
Visual no-code automation with AI agents, 3,000+ app integrations and an MCP server
8.2 /10
Pricing: Free plan, paid from $9/mo
Pros
- Low entry price ($9/month) and a usable free plan
- Flexible visual logic: routers, iterators, error handling
- Built-in AI agents plus an MCP server
- Credits roll over for 12 months on annual plans
Cons
- Cloud only, no self-hosting
- Credit use is hard to predict on busy scenarios
- Free plan limited to two active scenarios
- Large scenarios get hard to maintain
n8n
Fair-code workflow automation with AI agent nodes, self-hosted or in the cloud
8.6 /10
Pricing: Freemium
Pros
- Free self-hosted edition with unlimited workflows
- Deep AI agent tooling (LangChain nodes, memory, vector stores, MCP)
- Priced per execution, so long multi-step workflows stay affordable
- Large template library and active community
Cons
- Sustainable Use License is fair-code, not OSI open source
- Steeper learning curve than Zapier or Make
- Cloud prices shown in EUR only; Business tier jumps to €667/month
- Self-hosting means you own updates, backups and security
Make vs n8n at a glance
| Make | n8n | |
|---|---|---|
| Editor score | 8.2 / 10 | 8.6 / 10 |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting price | $9/mo | Free |
| Reader upvotes | 0 | 0 |
| Best for | automation, no-code, ai-agents | automation, ai-agents, self-hosted |
| Model choice | Yes | Yes |
| Commercial use | No | No |
| No watermark (free) | No | No |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Official MCP server | Yes | Yes |
| MCP client | No | Yes |
| Agent Skills | No | No |
| Brand kit | No | No |
| Teams | Yes | Yes |
| Content Credentials | No | No |
| Mobile app | No | No |
| 20+ languages | No | No |
| Makes | Blog posts & articles, Social media posts, Emails & newsletters, Ad & marketing copy | Blog posts & articles, Social media posts, Emails & newsletters, SEO content |
| AI models inside | 4 | 10 |
Our pick
n8n edges it with a score of 8.6 versus 8.2. n8n is the better fit if you value: free self-hosted edition with unlimited workflows, deep ai agent tooling (langchain nodes, memory, vector stores, mcp). Choose Make instead if you need: low entry price ($9/month) and a usable free plan, flexible visual logic: routers, iterators, error handling.
Other workflow builders & open studios to consider
Full ranking →ComfyUI Open source
Node-based open-source studio for image, video, audio and 3D generation workflows
Zapier Freemium
Popular no-code automation with AI agents, Copilot and an MCP server across 8,000+ apps
InvokeAI Open source
Open-source canvas studio for image generation, now community-maintained
Fooocus Open source
Simple offline SDXL image generator, now in bug-fix-only maintenance