Gamma vs Pitch (2026): Which AI Tool Is Better?

Both are popular presentations & documents. Here is how Gamma and Pitch stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.

Gamma

AI that turns a prompt or document into presentations, documents and websites

8.7 /10

Pricing: Freemium

Pros

Fast, attractive decks from a prompt or document
Large choice of image models
API on Pro and above
Shareable web links with analytics

Cons

Free credits are one-time and exports carry a badge
Per-member billing adds up for teams
Premium image models burn credits fast
PowerPoint export can need clean-up

Visit Gamma ↗

Pitch

Collaborative presentation software with AI generation and a free plan

7.5 /10

Pricing: Freemium

Pros

Free plan for up to 5 members
Strong real-time collaboration
Link sharing with analytics and pitch rooms
PowerPoint import and export

Cons

Free exports are branded
Only 100 one-time AI credits on Free
AI generation less capable than Gamma
Prices shown in EUR; USD not confirmed

Visit Pitch ↗

Gamma vs Pitch at a glance

	Gamma	Pitch
Editor score	8.7 / 10	7.5 / 10
Pricing model	Freemium	Freemium
Starting price	Free	Free
Reader upvotes	0	0
Best for	presentations, ai-slides, documents	presentations, collaboration, startups
Model choice	Yes	No
Commercial use	No	No
No watermark (free)	No	No
API	Yes	No
Official MCP server	No	No
MCP client	No	No
Agent Skills	No	No
Brand kit	No	Yes
Teams	Yes	Yes
Content Credentials	No	No
Mobile app	No	No
20+ languages	No	No
Makes	Presentations & docs, Images & illustrations	Presentations & docs
AI models inside	4	0

Our pick

Gamma edges it with a score of 8.7 versus 7.5. Gamma is the better fit if you value: fast, attractive decks from a prompt or document, large choice of image models. Choose Pitch instead if you need: free plan for up to 5 members, strong real-time collaboration.